<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Convention over Configuration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.englishteeth.co.uk/2008/04/18/convention-over-configuration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.englishteeth.co.uk/2008/04/18/convention-over-configuration/</link>
	<description>... the weblog of Ian "English Teeth" Robinson</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 08:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: englishteeth.co.uk &#187; Grails, JMS and an MDB</title>
		<link>http://www.englishteeth.co.uk/2008/04/18/convention-over-configuration/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>englishteeth.co.uk &#187; Grails, JMS and an MDB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 12:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.englishteeth.co.uk/?p=36#comment-34</guid>
		<description>[...] I sort of set a challenge when thinking about Convention over Configuration, I had to see if it was in fact doable in a framework that exploits the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I sort of set a challenge when thinking about Convention over Configuration, I had to see if it was in fact doable in a framework that exploits the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
